Dickerson v. United States, 175 F.2d 440 (4th Cir. 1949)
175 F.2d 440
US-DOC-21088827
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Dickerson v. United States, 175 F.2d 440 (4th Cir. 1949)
Full caption
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 21, 1949
Disposition
Affirmed
No. 5884.
Argued June 13, 1949.
Decided June 21, 1949.
Leslie Dickerson, pro se.
Theodore G Bethea, Asst. U.S. Atty.,. Reedsville, N. C. (Bryce R. Holt, U.S.. Atty., and R. Kennedy Harris, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, N. G, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence of imprisonment. In the year 1946, appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 2550 et seq., 3220 et seq., in having in his possession a quantity, of codeine ad morphine without having registered and paid the tax as required by the act. The only question raised by the appeal is the sufficiency of the indictment, but the indictment was clearly sufficient to sustain the judgment and sentence. As we said quite recently, the law is that an indictment, the sufficiency of which is not questioned on the trial, will not be held insufficient on a motion to vacate the judgment entered thereon unless p. 441it is so obviously defective that by no reasonable construction can it be said to •charge the offense for which conviction was had. Pifer v. United States, 4 Cir., 158 F.2d 867; Lucas v. United States, 4 Cir., 158 F.2d 865.
Affirmed.