Dano v. United States, 91 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir. 1937)
91 F.2d 1012
US-DOC-21085060
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Dano v. United States, 91 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir. 1937)
Full caption
Nick DANO, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
3d Cir.
Decided
Aug. 5, 1937
No. 6384.
Aug. 5, 1937.
For opinion below, see 20 F.Supp. 458.
John D. Meyer, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Charles F. ‘Uhl, U. S. Atty., and George Mashank, Asst. U. S. Atty., both'of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Before BUFFINGTON, THOMPSON, and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In the court below Nick Dano was tried, convicted, and sentenced on an indictment charging him with certain violations of Joint Resolution No. 373, section 1162a, .title 26 U.S.C.A., and Regulation 17 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. , Thereupon he took this appeal from an order of the court denying his motio.n in arrest of judgment, and the question involved is the constitutionality of such legislation and regulation. That question was decided in an opinion of the judge below reported in (D.C.) 20 F.Supp. 458.
After consideration had, we affirm the court’s action, adopting its opinion as the view of this court.