Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. Bank, 99 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1938)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. Bank, 99 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1938)
Full caption
SPRAGUE v. TICONIC NAT. BANK et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
1st Cir.
Decided
Oct. 29, 1938
No. 3347.
Oct. 29, 1938.
Harvey D. Eaton, of Watcrville, Me., for appellant.
F. Harold Dubord, of Watcrville, Me., for appellees.
Before BINGHAM and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decree of the District Court of April 20, 1938, is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion of April 16, 1938, and for the further reason that the term of court at which the decree was entered, when the petition to amend was filed, had long since passed, and the amendment sought went to the substance of the decree and not to its form. See Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Minnesota, 275 U.S. 70, 48 S.Ct. 97, 72 L.Ed. 168; Hart v. Wiltsee et al., 1 Cir., 25 F.2d 863, and cases there cited; Casey v. Sterling Cider Co., 1 Cir., 15 F. 2d 52, and Schell v. Dodge, 107 U.S. 629, 2 S.Ct. 830, 27 L.Ed. 601.
The decree of the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the appellees.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access