Whaley v. Cavanaugh, 341 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1965)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Whaley v. Cavanaugh, 341 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1965)
Full caption
Clarence E. WHALEY, Plaintiff, v. Edward CAVANAUGH (Badge 1024) and Any Person Who Conspired to Deprive Plaintiff of Rights, Privileges and Immunities Guaranteed by the Constitution, et al., Defendants.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
Feb. 8, 1965
Disposition
Per Curiam Affirmed
No. 19122.
Feb. 8, 1965.
Clarence E. Whaley, in pro. per.
Thomas M. O’Connor, City Atty., George Agnost, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.
Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion filed November 14, 1963, reported in 237 F.Supp. 900.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access