Dyer v. Wilson, 363 F.2d 955 (9th Cir. 1966)

Case details
Citation
363 F.2d 955
Full caption
Joseph L. DYER, Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
July 22, 1966
Disposition
Per Curiam Affirmed
No. 20732.
July 22, 1966.
Joseph L. Dyer, Tamal, Cal., in pro. per.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Granucci, Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for ap-pellee.
Before KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a California state prisoner, seeks his release from custody by writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied him relief. We affirm.
By his petition appellant attacks the legality of his conviction by the Superior Court of the State of California on April 12, 1962, of the crimes of kidnapping, rape and robbery. However, he is presently serving sentences previously imposed by said court as punishment for several other crimes. His petition is premature. McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238 (1932).
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access