Janeway v. Comm'r, 147 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1945)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Janeway v. Comm'r, 147 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1945)
Full caption
JANEWAY et ux. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. SHIELDS v. SAME.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
2d Cir.
Decided
Feb. 6, 1945
Nos. 29, 30.
Feb. 6, 1945.
Wright, Gordon, Zachry, Parlin & Ca-hill, of New York City (Charles C. Parlin and Robert C. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners.
Samuel O. Qark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, A. F. Prescott, and Newton K. Fox, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before CPIASE, HUTCHESON, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
We read the findings of the Tax Court taken together with its opinion1 as saying that, as a matter of fact, all the payments made by the taxpayers to the corporation were capital contributions of such character that, as against any third persons (such as, e.g., persons contracting with the corporation) the taxpayers would have to be regarded as stockholders and nothing else. As the Tax Court’s conclusion rests upon a determination of fact supported by substantial evidence,2 we cannot disturb it, even under a restricted interpretation of Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239.3 Accepting that conclusion, the decision of the Tax Court is correct.
Affirmed.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access